![]() |
Home -> Gee Chronicles -> Hand Archive
|
UDCA! OK?
West's opening 1H is the root of all evil in today's auction. A more usual 1NT would provoke either a pass or, conceivably, an invitational raise by East (I would pass the East hand over 1NT); and with best play by both sides declarer most likely makes eight tricks. On the actual auction, however, East replies a forcing 1NT. West raises to 2NT, for his second bad bid of the auction (2D is better), East aggressively accepts the invitation, and here we are, in another apparently hopeless 3NT. A low spade lead forces declarer to fly the SQ from dummy for eight tricks, let alone nine, but Gee, South, opens the SA, on which North plays the jack, indicating possession of the 10. (Of course the J could be stiff, but in this case East suppressed a five-card spade suit over 1H.) A low spade continuation beats the contract straightaway, and so does a switch to either minor, although the play is a little cloudier. Gee thinks matters over and switches to a heart. Declarer wins in hand and leads a low club toward the queen, pretty much his only quasi-legitimate chance for nine tricks. North wins with the CK, and now makes his crucial contribution to the defense by returning the DK, the only way to let the game make. Declarer wins, plays back the D10, which North ducks to no avail, and continues a third round of diamonds. +600. This provokes a lively post mortem: G: aren't we playing udca?
Don't talk about what you don't know, aaron... Looks like you
have actually nothing to talk about following this principle!... And I would
like to know the names of your 4 imbeciles who made the comments you relate...
they'd better learn how UDCA works, and you too before making such stupid, off the wall comments...
In the Contract Bridge Bulletin of August 2002, at the very bottom
of page 46: "Berkowitz led the HQ and Cohen dropped the HJ to show the 10." Clearly Larry
Cohen is unfamiliar with the "Law of Gerard" and the subtleties of GUDCA. Perhaps Gee will
enlighten the bridge world with a new treatise on defense. Suggested titles may be Bridge Defense Is Cooperative or Defensive
Conversations In Bridge.
© 2002-2003 by Aaron Haspel. All rights reserved. |
||||||||||||||||||