Return to godofthemachine main page

Home -> Gee Chronicles -> Hand Archive
About
Archives
Baseball
Contact
CVS
DO IT!
Gee Chronicles
Hall of Reciprocity
Pledge of Quality
Webmaster
What Time Is It?

THE GEE CHRONICLES

Main
Ask Dr. Robert
Honor Roll
News
Stats
Table Talk
Who's the Captain?
WWGD

BRIDGE

Aces on Bridge Archives
ACBL
Thomas Andrews
Bridge Forum Archives
Bridge Matters
Bridge Plus
Bridge World
Fifth Chair
Gee Chronicles
Jeff Goldsmith Archives
Great Bridge Links
House of Cards
IMP Bridge
Internet Bridge Archive
Karen's Bridge Links
Kibitzer
OKBridge
Richard Pavlicek Archive
Swan Games
WBF

Bride of Trump Support

Both Vul
IMPs
Dealer: South
BGO
S A Q 9 5 3 2
H A K 8
D A J 10 8
C --
Lead:D4
priceat
S K J 8 4
H 9 3
D 9 6 5
C K 10 9 8
[W - E]
wildcats
S 10
H Q J 10 7 6 4
D 4
C Q 7 5 3 2
 
Gerard
S 7 6
H 5 2
D K Q 7 3 2
C A J 7 4
Result: Down 1
Score: -100
Points: -11.81

West
(priceat)

Pass
Pass
Pass
North
(BGO)

1 S
6 S
East
(wildcats)

3 H
Pass
South
(Gerard)
Pass
3 S
Pass

In a previous hand from the Chronicles, Gee demonstrated the importance of supporting partner's suit, even with a void. Today we see a variation on the theme.

North opens 1S third-hand, East makes an aggressive preemptive overcall in hearts, and once again it is up to our hero, South.

A negative double might suggest itself. Excellent hand, 5-4 in the unbid suits -- exactly what's required for a negative double at the three-level. Gee, however, somehow divines that the best fit for the partnership is spades, and bids 3S.

At this point North's only problem is whether to play a small slam or a grand. He conservatively leaps to 6S. Cue-bidding clubs is better but probably leads to the same contract. (What Gee should bid over 4C, having already bid 3S, is a fascinating but esoteric question, outside the scope of this discussion.)

6D of course is cold, and even 7D has a play on the layout, although it's tricky to manage the entries against a heart lead. But in 6S declarer must lose two trump tricks, down 1. I turn the analysis over to the players:

BGO: no luck
BGO: 7D was on
G: happens, pd... I took a great risk with 3S
G: was not going to show D on this auction
BGO: x would have been nice on 3H
G: I could figure we had a fit in S
BGO: agree
G: and we had little room to bid over 3H too... 2 reasons why I did not double
G: not that they were the best in the world
G: but...
G: (Lobby) Need EXPERT pd @ Gerard

Comments

Kinda like the bottom line there. Expert pd needed, BG Olofsson is just one of those and he left. Go figure.

nordgren 8.24.02 1:22 AM EST

© 2002-2003 by Aaron Haspel. All rights reserved.

Please add any comments here. Read the policy first.

Email (required):
OKBridge name (optional):