{"id":323,"date":"2003-02-10T08:31:56","date_gmt":"2003-02-10T12:31:56","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=323"},"modified":"2007-03-17T16:51:24","modified_gmt":"2007-03-17T20:51:24","slug":"family-tree","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.godofthemachine.com\/?p=323","title":{"rendered":"Family Tree"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Mark Goldblatt <a href=\"http:\/\/jewishworldreview.com\/0203\/goldblatt.html\">attends an MLA conference<\/a> and gives Professor Turtleneck the what-for:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>As the session was winding down, I decided to ask a question. This is something I habitually do after such discussions; it&#8217;s sadistic act, the academic equivalent of shooting fish in a barrel, and it speaks badly of my character. I directed my question to Professor Turtleneck  though it could as well have been addressed to virtually anyone in the room. Recalling his notion of a &#8220;state of semi-erudition&#8221; that characterized those who support President Bush&#8217;s war on terrorism, I pointed out that many of Bush&#8217;s supporters would characterize the antiwar movement in much the same way. &#8220;As an epistemological matter,&#8221; I asked, &#8220;how do you deal with the fact that each side sees the other as uninformed? You don&#8217;t want to make the claim that your knowledge is somehow <i>privileged<\/i>, do you?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>There was an awkward, slightly panicky pause after I asked this.<\/p>\n<p>Professor Turtleneck began his response by saying he&#8217;d cut a lot out of the paper he&#8217;d read and then segued into an utterly irrelevant tap dance about Adorno&#8217;s own epistemological presuppositions. He was interrupted after a minute by a man sitting behind me, who called out, &#8220;You&#8217;re not answering the question! You can&#8217;t deny that you&#8217;re making a claim to knowledge here!&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m not denying that,&#8221; Professor Turtleneck insisted. &#8220;I&#8217;m only saying that <i>Adorno<\/i> would say . . .&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>If Turtleneck&#8217;s intellectual father, so to speak, is Adorno, then his grandfather is Marx, who theorized that everyone&#8217;s thought is determined by his class, and thus his opponents were merely bourgeois apologists. Only Marx himself, and possibly Engels, are exempt from this iron law. <\/p>\n<p>His great-grandfather is Kant, inventor of the noumenal (&#8220;real&#8221;) world, as distinct from the phenomenal world, which we actually perceive. Nothing can be known about the noumenal world except that it exists, and even that much only if you&#8217;re Kant.<\/p>\n<p>His great-great-grandfather is Plato, who held that an ideal version of everything exists in some region too bright for human eyes to gaze upon directly &#8212; unless they&#8217;re Plato&#8217;s. <\/p>\n<p>Archimedes said that, with a lever and a place to stand, he could move the world. Like all of his illustrious predecessors, all Professor Turtleneck lacks is a place to stand.<\/p>\n<p>We may conclude, incidentally, that <a href=\"http:\/\/trochim.human.cornell.edu\/tutorial\/cheng\/lcheng.htm\">regression to the mean<\/a> is as much a rule in intellectual families as in actual ones.<\/p>\n<p>(Thanks to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.2blowhards.com\">the Blowhards<\/a> for the link.)<\/p>\n<p>(<b>Update:<\/b> <a href=\"http:\/\/cinderellabloggerfeller.blogspot.com\/2003_02_09_cinderellabloggerfeller_archive.html#88908564\">Cinderella<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/philosoblog.blogspot.com\/2003_02_01_philosoblog_archive.html#88956622\">Jim Ryan<\/a> comment.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mark Goldblatt attends an MLA conference and gives Professor Turtleneck the what-for: As the session was winding down, I decided to ask a question. This is something I habitually do after such discussions; it&#8217;s sadistic act, the academic equivalent of shooting fish in a barrel, and it speaks badly of my character. I directed my <a href='https:\/\/www.godofthemachine.com\/?p=323' class='excerpt-more'>[&#8230;]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-323","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-philosophy","category-4-id","post-seq-1","post-parity-odd","meta-position-corners","fix"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.godofthemachine.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/323","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.godofthemachine.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.godofthemachine.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.godofthemachine.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.godofthemachine.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=323"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.godofthemachine.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/323\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.godofthemachine.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=323"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.godofthemachine.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=323"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.godofthemachine.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=323"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}