“Form follows function — that has been misunderstood. Form and function should be one, joined in a spiritual union.” Frank Lloyd Wright said this. Wright built houses, and the function of houses, as I understand it, is to be lived in. Roofs, too, have functions, among which is to keep out the rain. One might think that a leaky roof would disturb this “spiritual union,” but AC Douglas dismisses this pedestrian concern:

Wright’s houses, for instance, are notorious for their leaky roofs. As a house is the most elemental and paradigmatic instance of a shelter a leaky roof would seem a most damning and fundamental fault. And so it would be were the house simply a building. With the possible exception of his earliest work, none of Wright’s houses qualifies as simply a building. They’re all, as is all great architecture of any sort whatsoever, first and foremost works of art. That’s to say, considerations of the aesthetic trump all else.

Buildings, no matter whose, are not “first and foremost” works of art because they are not works of art at all. “Art” is not an encomium. It is a technical term, referring to things that are intended solely as objects of contemplation. There is a fine word for edifices of this sort; the word is “sculpture.” Buildings can be beautiful or ugly, just as people can, which doesn’t make them art any more than people are. If aesthetics, in Wright’s buildings, “trump all else,” why do they need roofs at all? Tables and chairs clutter rooms so, why not dispose of them? Walls disrupt the continuity between the house and its surroundings; tear ‘em down. Wright would be the first to say that this is silly, and so it is, but it is the reductio of AC’s position.

This is a case of a misapplied metaphor. The modern religion, as Tom Wolfe beat me to pointing out, is art, which has become the highest term of praise for anything at all. A well-played bridge hand, a well-placed insult, a nice-looking ashtray are all “works of art.” Except they aren’t, and neither is architecture. Art is art, and non-art is non-art, and never the twain shall meet.

(Update: AC Douglas replies. Brian Micklethwait comments. Alexandra Seely comments. Rene comments.)

Aaron Haspel | Posted August 28, 2003 @ 5:59 PM | Culture

7 Responses to “Obligatory Frank Lloyd Wright Post”

  1. 1 1. alienware m17x

    Yes you could almost say that in practice function followed form with Frank.

  2. 2 2. Herb

    having toured many of Wright’s buildings I have to agree but so much that he borrowed in minimalist design was highly functional in that period or culture. Borrowed by Wright, they are considered artistic masterpieces.

  3. 3 3. apartments in fairfax

    This information is worth everyone’s attention. When can I find out more?

    my web page :: apartments in fairfax

  4. 4 4. learn to start A blog

    I drop a comment when I like a article on a site or if I have something to valuable to
    contribute to the conversation. It is triggered by the sincerness displayed in the
    article I read. And on this article Obligatory Frank
    Lloyd Wright Post at God of the Machine. I was excited enough to post a thought :
    -P I actually do have some questions for you if you tend not to mind.
    Is it simply me or do some of these comments
    look like they are coming from brain dead visitors?
    :-P And, if you are writing at other places, I’d like to follow you.
    Would you make a list every one of all your community sites like your Facebook
    page, twitter feed, or linkedin profile?

  5. 5 5. plantation fl apartments

    I do not even know how I stopped up right here, but I assumed this post was once great.

    I do not understand who you might be however definitely you’re going to a well-known blogger if you happen to aren’t already.

    Feel free to visit my web site :: plantation fl apartments

  6. 6 6. birth injury

    Good post however I was wanting to know if you could
    write a litte more on this topic? I’d be very thankful if you could elaborate a little bit further.

  7. 7 7. mobile games

    I’m truly enjoying the design and layout of your website.
    It’s a very easy on the eyes which makes it much more pleasant for me to come here and visit more often.

    Did you hire out a designer to create your theme? Exceptional work!

Add a Comment

Basic HTML acceptable. Two-link limit per comment.